Thursday, December 10, 2009

1) The play scene was a turning point because it is the first scene in which hamlet has truly descended into madness. Ophelia has betrayed him, his mother betrayed him, his father dead. This is where he starts insulting everyone and everything. This scene is where Hamlet confirms Claudius' murder, more importantly though this is the scene in which Claudius knows that Hamlet knows. The cards are on the table from here on out.
2)
Exposition: The exposition is the background information, in this we are told of fortinbras and the nation preparing for war, we are also told of the arrangements which brought Claudius to kingship(with the exception of murder of course) and how hamlet feels about the incestuous relationship between his mother and uncle.

Inciting event:the inciting is when Hamlet meets the ghost of his dead father, this will set into motion Hamlets rampage into madness as well as his slow crusade against Claudius, and ultimately the death of everyone.

Rising Action: In the rising action, hamlet feigns madness, Claudius feigns caring, Ophelia retracts her love, Polonius spys on everyone, Gertrude is unhappy, Rozencrants and Guildenstern spy on hamlet, Laertes goes gambling, and Horatio remains honest. (in no particular order) Basically everything up to the death of Polonius is rising action.
1.) Claudius sends Rosencrantz and Guildenstern along with Hamlet to England, where he has sent word to have the trio terminated. He does this quickly because Hamlet is adored by the (whatever state Denmark is in(Norway?))ish people and hopes not to cause an uproar. He claims that the group is being sent in order to collect tribute which the English owe.
2.) While Hamlet speaks with his mother, Polonius will hide so as to again attempt to see what is causing Hamlet's madness.
3.) Claudius Admits that he killed the king
His guilt is so strong he cannot pray, he knows he has done horible deeds yet cannot bring himself to repent the actions.
He reveals the reasons he has commited the murder-crown, lady, and ambition.
4.)It is odd that Hamlet sees the king praying because Claudius is not in fact praying. Because he will not give up the gains he has made for his sins, he cannot repent and ask for forgiveness. Hamlet saw Claudius pretending to pray, or perhaps trying to pray, but there was no real praying going on.
5 Hamlet spares the life of Claudius because Claudius is praying. His father was killed before he could perform his last rights and thus is doomed to spend time in purgatory. Hamlet believes that if he kills Claudius while praying he will ascend to heaven. This shows Hamlets unwillingness to do the deed. He even states that he will kill him while he is performing some unholy and vile act. Yet 4 months has passes since his fathers death and he has still not succeeded in avenging the king.

1.) Polonius hopes to trick Hamlet into revealing his secret by appealing to his child like instincts. He asks Gertrude to :"be round with him" to tell him that she has shielded him from outrage at his insane actions and behavior. They are attempting this becasue Ophelia has clearly failed. So they must try a different route to the princes heart. Polonius then hides behind the curtain where he will die.
2.) Hamlet yells it after he kills polonius. He is insulting Polonius by calling him a rat and by saying his life is only worth one ducat. This could tie in with the army that hamlet meets later on, they tell him that the ladnn they are fighting for is only worth 5 ducats.
3.) In this quote hamlet insinuates that his morther was part of the killing of his father. However there are few explicit details to support this and this has never been brought up before. What is most interesting is that the ghost of his father never said anything about Gertrude being involved, in fact he asked Hamlet to look after his mother. This could signal that Hamlet is no longer following the Ghost's wishes but merely acting upon the whim of his own insanity.
4.) Gertrude says this because she is still attempting to maintain her innocence. Hamlet is accusing her of being involve with his fathers death, in his mind she must be for she moved so fast from brother to brother. She is taken aback by such accusations and defends herself.
5.) King Hamlet is described as a man blessed by all the ancient Greek gods.
Claudius is described as a mildewed ear of corn, one which stains all other corn around him. This again brings in the idea of ears, and Gertrude would be one of the nearby corns, one poisoned by the original corruption.
6.) Hamlet means to show that Gertrude has sided with the clearly weaker and ill-fated man, that the nature of Claudius causes him to corrupt and weakin those around him. Again he hints that she was involved in the murder of Old Hamlet
7.) Hamlet used these descriptions to describe his mothers relationship with Claudius. The nasty sty might also be referring to the decaying corpse of his fathers body. The body of the father being what brought the two together, as Hamlet believes that Gertrude corroborated with Claudius in the murder. The image of which is quite disturbing.
Mickey also informs me that" the nasty sty is more pleasing than the missionary. "
8.) The apparition of old hamlet stops Hamlet from berating his mother. The ghost tells him to get on with his almost "dulled" vengeance and go after Claudius.
9.) Hamlet makes many philisophical arguments about humanity, saying "do not spread fertilizer on weeds" and such, mostly negative comments. These are all fairly hypocritical as he is planing to kill his father in law, widow his mother, and ultimately destroy his country in order to seek revenge for his father who is already dead.
10.) In act I the ghost is clear and descriptive, although it disappears rapidly with the crowing of the cock. It wants revenge in both scenes however in the second scene the ghost is fleeting. Perhaps protecting Gertrude from Hamlet.

Tuesday, December 8, 2009

Act 3
Scene 1:
1. What do Rosencrantz and Guildenstern report to Polonius?
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern report that Hamlet is not mad, but he is disturbed over something. They do not know what disturbs him however, and doubt that it is his lost love with ophelia.
2. How does Claudius react when Polonius says, "…with devotion's visage, And pious action we do sugar o'er/ The devil himself"?
****
3. What plan do Polonius, Claudius and Ophelia now put into action?
Claudius, Polonius, and Ophelia make a plan so that Claudius and Polonius will hide as Ophelia will talk to Hamlet. Ophelia is supposed to test Hamlet's love, to see how he reacts to her when she returns his love letters, which is a form of insult.
4. What is the nature of Hamlet's soliloquy, lines 57-91?
Hamlet's soliloquy is discussing the pro's and cons of inaction, he weighs the pain and grief that killing claudius will have against the duty he has to avenge his father.
5. What is Hamlet's main argument against suicide?
Hamlet's main argument against suicide is that no-one knows what the afterlife will bring. He does not know "what dreams may come" This is why "conscience makes cowards of us all", for the ones who are brave do not fear the unknown and die quickly while those afraid linger on the earth.
6. Why does Hamlet treat Ophelia as cruelly as he does? What has changed him?
Hamlet treats Ophelia cruely first when she returns his love letters, but when he really goes off on her is when she lies about her father. "where is your father" "at home my lord" He is distraught that ophelia was able to lie while looking him in the eyes. THis is the last straw for him, his father dead, his mother abandoned his father, his uncle married his mother, and now ophelia lying to him:he is abandoned by everyone, and so his sanity abandons him.
7. What thinly veiled threat to Claudius does Hamlet voice, after he becomes of his hidden presence? (lines 148-150)
"those that are married already-all but one -shall live; the rest shall keep as they are."
He is attacking the institution of marriage, he implies that all those who are married will die except for one, his mother.
8. At the end of this scene, what does the King decide to do with Hamlet?
Scene 2:
At the end of the scene the king decides to send Hamlet to England to collect tribute. Although this may seem like an attempt to help hamlet by distracting him, it is in fact an attempt to get Hamlet away from himself. This shows that the king is fearful of what Hamlet is capable of, and what he might know.
9. What qualities in Horatio cause Hamlet to enlist his assistance?
Hamlet trusts in Horatio because he is honest, scholarly, and was the one which called upon hamlet to witness his fathers ghost. In hamlets mind Horatio is thus connected with his fathers spirit and the underworld.
10. What does Hamlet ask Horatio to do?
Hamlet asks Horatio to spy on Claudius as he reacts to the opening scene of Mousetrap. He is starting to believe accusations that he is crazy. He wants a second opinion to confirm his suspicions of Claudius.
11. Summarize what happens in the play-within-a-play.
In the play within a play, a man is poisened and his lover marries the poisoner. After that his nephew is vowing revenge, at this point claudius gets upset and leaves.
12. Why, in line 233, does Hamlet refer to the play-within-a-play as "The Mouse-trap"?
Hamlet refers to the play as mousetrap because he uses it to catch claudius acting like a rat.
13. What is the King's reaction to the play?
The king is so upset by the play that he leaves and the play ends. This confirms hamlets suspicions of the kings murder.
14. In lines 354-363, to what object does Hamlet compare himself? Why?
Hamlet compares himself to a flute, and attacks Guildenstern for attempting to
15. As Hamlet goes to his mother at the end of this scene, what does he admonish himself?

hamlet soliloquy

Hamlet soliloquy-
Should I act or not? which would bring more disgrace, to suffer and bear the burden of such outrageous fortune silently, or to fight back against such felonies. If i oppose these acts, i will end them. But inaction, to sleep, there's the problem. In not acting, There is the chance to dream, the chance to rid oneself of the problems of the world. But this dream is only a chance and there's the problem. In life we are always concerned with this dream. Those who bear the blows of oppressors, even if they are wrong, will grunt and sweat under a weary life. But the dread of something after. We should rather bear the ills born against us than risk further dread which we cant fore-see. The conscience makes cowards of us all, action is lost to the realms of thought only. Their paths turn awry and lose the name of action. Oh ophelia, remember my sins, you are a fairy in thy being.

Monday, December 7, 2009

act II stuff

1) What does Polonius tell Reynaldo in the opening of Act II? How does he plan to trap his son?
Reynaldo is told to follow Laertes and to see who he associated with. Polonius is afraid that Laertes is committing un-noble deeds and that it will come back to mar his reputation. Reynaldo is supposed to spread false rumors about Laertes, and to gauge the response of Laertes friends in order to determine which rumors are false and which are true.
2) What does this say about Polonius?
this shows that Polonius is more worried about his own reputation and political aspirations than his sons. Instead of confronting his son, he sends reynaldo to spy on him, furthermore he specifically instructs reynaldo to spread these rumors in a way, in which, no evidence will come back to him. This is in concurence with what Hamlet will say about polonius' character, he is a self-loving pimp, and a prostitute.
3) What particularly in Act II scene 1 has disturbed Ophelia?
Hamlet has appeared to Ophelia half naked and acting mad. She doesn't know why he has done this, and is disturbed so she discuses it with her father who tells her that Hamlet is professing his love for her. They must go to the king and arrange a marriage, this is in contrast to last act when polonius told her to stay away from hamlet, but now he sees a chance for political gain.
4) Why have Rosencrantez and Guildenstern been sent to Denmark?
Rosencrantz and guildenstern are sent to denmark by the king and queen. They are Hamlet's childhood friends, and so the king and queen hope they will be trusted. They are told to watch hamlet and to see if his madness stems truly from the death of his father, and if they can fix his illness. Deeper down the king fears that hamlet has somehow discovered the truth of his fathers death, and is coming to kill him.
5) What does Hamlet ask the players to recite? How does the allusion mimic Hamlet’s position?
hamlet asks the players to first recite Aenea's tale to dido, in which the mother watches as the son of Achiles avenges his father and slays Priam. this is almost a perfect parallel to what is happening to Hamlet, but it is more of a though on how his mother will feel. he is afraid that she will be traumatized or die in grief at the loss of so much love.
Identify the following speaker of the following lines and discuss to whom the lines are being delivered, and what the lines mean?
6) “No, my lord, but as you did command/ I did repel his letter, and denied his access to me” Ophelia- Ophelia is telling her father that she has done him well, she has rejected Hamlet's attempts at love.
7) “More matter less art” The queen demands that polonius stops his foolishness and gets to the point, he resoponds with more nonsense.
8) “That I, the son of a dear father murdered,/ Prompted to my revenge by heaven and hell/ Must like a whore unpack my heart with words,
Hamlets soliloquy
9) “Your bait of falsehood take this carp of truth/ And thus do we of wisdom and of reach,/ with windlasses and with assays of bias,/ By directions find directions out.”
Hamlet's speech to polonius, he bashes on polonius and call him a pimp and stupid

10) “For if the sun breeds maggots in a dead dog, being a good kissing carrion-Have you a daughter?”
Hamlets crazy speech to Polonius, he knows polonius has a daughter but is attempting to act insane. Very successfully.
11) List three metaphors (1 direct, 1 implied, 1 extended) from the play.
Polonius' comparison of Hamlet's love to burst of fire is a direct metaphor, Hamlet's use of fishmonger is an implied metaphor, and the calling people prositutes is an extended metaphor.
12) What proof does Polonius have that he believe indicates Hamlet’s love for Ophelia?
Polonius believes that Hamlet is in love with ophelia because of Hamlet's naked attempt at their love. Hamlet however is only acting insane not in love, and this is another comment on Polonius' intelligence.
13) Explain the quote, “There is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so.” How does this relate to Hamlet.
this is true of everything, nothing is inherently good or bad, however if you think something is bad it may be so.
14) What is a fishmonger? A fishmonger is someone who sells fish on the wharf, this relates to polonius because he is selling of his daughter... its also a a sexual innuendo.
15) Who was Jephthah? Jephtaph was a character from the bible who sacrificed his daughter in order to save himself. he hopes to achieve political gain through his sacrifice.

Thursday, December 3, 2009

soliloquy rewrite

Oh why, Why! if only he would stop shooting that stupid cannon and turn it on himself. this world has no more joy for me. The garden of eden is unweeded, there is corruption in this place of innocence, corruption and unnaturalness. Two months Dead! just two months, not even! My father was such an excellent king. He was so loving and devoted to my mother, he wouldn't let the winds of heaven buffet her too roughly. Why must I remember him? She would hang on him as if the more she hung on him the more she needed him. AND WITHIN A MONTH!! Don't think of it!
Women are so weak. She followed his casket, all tears. A beast of reason would have mourned longer, and then she married my uncle? He was my brother's father yet no more like my father than i am to hercules. her tears are still on her cheeks! she married so fast. She flees to incestuous sheets, it cannot come to good. it will kill me for I must hold my tongue.

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

1) What is Laertes advice to Ophelia?
laertes advice to ophelia is to shield herself from hamlets love because hamlet has a duty to the state. This duty will most likely call him to refuse Ophelia's love and take a foreign princess for a wife.
2) How does “The canker galls the infants of the spring/ too oft before their buttons be disclos’d” fit into the ideology of the decaying garden?

3) What analogy does Ophelia give to her brother as an answer to his advice? What does she mean?
ophelia tells her brother off, saying that he is a hypocrite and should take care of his own whore-mongering and gambling problems before he tries to advise her.

4) List five of the “few precepts” that Polonius gives to Laertes.
polonius tells laertes to

5) In lines 105-109, what is the metaphor that Polonius uses to describe Hamlet’s words of love?
Polonius uses the metaphor that hamlets love is silver which is not sterling or it is impure. This relates to the theme of virginity because virgins were more pure than others. Furthermore he describes ophelia as a baby, a naive and Innocent child yet easily taken advantage of. He also threatens her saying that if she does fall for Hamlet's tenders, she will embarrass him.
6) List and explain one metaphor found in the lines 115-135.
describes these blazes as beautiful and attractive, tempting. Yet in one metaphor is that of "blazes" which are meant to symbolize Hamlet's promises. Poloniusreality they have no warmth and in the end the light fades as well. This is again to dissed Ophelia from hamlet because he fears he will be made a fool when hamlet leaves her.
7) What is Polonius’ command to Ophelia?
Polonius' command to Ophelia is that she should never talk to Hamlet, she should forget him and move on.
8) In scene 4, what is Hamlet talking about in lines 13-38?
Hamlet is talking about the downfalls of his nation, they have become so committed to their customs and their drunkenness that they become weak and susceptible to outside attack.
9) Why doesn’t Horatio want Hamlet to follow the ghost?
Horatio wants hamlet to follow the ghost because he believes the ghost is sent to inform them of the demise of the nation. Perhaps if hamlet follows hamlet he will be able to find out how the nation will fall.
10) What is Hamlet’s command to the three guards?
hamlet orders the three guards to stay put and not follow him as he talks to his dead dad.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

The knight- noble, experienced, modest, and gallant. The knight is dressed very humbly and is described as having traveled basically everywhere. Chaucer respects and fears the knight, for the warrior is aloof and noble. He does not fit in with the other upper class men who are described as idiots or evil beings.
Squire- young, merry, horny. The squire is dressed extravagantly, and knows the way of the court quite well. He is the antithesis of his father, he is in the business of war for love and fame against his fathers honor. The squire represents inexperience and I would not be surprised if he died.
Yeoman-again a man of experience (like a nut), he is surprisingly well dressed for a woodsman. He carries a massive bow, shield, and sword, and knows the ways of woodcraft. Chaucer is impressed with his garb, yet is wary of him. How can such a woodsman be so rich. He respects the mans hands-on experience yet believes there are some devious intentions within the yeoman.
Prioress-a woman who wants to be in courtly affairs rather than be a nun, she is described as overly loving and meek and a bit flirty. She cries at the death of a mouse or the beating of a dog, which is unfit for a nun. She also is described for her beauty. She is the first church related person and begins the trend... Chaucer hates them all. She wants to be in the court, is a nun, is overly caring. These things are used to show how the church is obsessed with more worldly goods than the spirituality it should be.
Monk-A man who neglects his duties to have a good time, he is a hunter, and often not in church. He has a lovers not for jewelry, similar to the prioress who had a "love unites all" pin. The monk keeps his horse in good condition and has many other animals which shows he is more practical than many of his fellow church men, he is also tan to support this. Out of all the church members this is Chaucer's favorite, for although he is neglecting his church duties he is lively. His robes are described as the color of rotten fruit to show how the church has spoiled a perfectly good man.
Friar-Evil, bad man, only focused on money and women. He impregnates and then marries of girls, he only deals with the rich but gets money from everyone. He lied about his permit from the pope. Chaucer hates him, hes fat lazy, a sly talker, and again not a good church member. Oh yeah he sleeps with young girls too. for what the author intends to do see the above two... church bad, the friar specifically brings out the sexual contrast between what the church is practicing and preaching (pun intended)
Merchant- The merchant thinks too highly of himself, he dresses much more elegantly than he can afford. He is also a pirate or someone in some illegal activity, why else bring up the police on a first date? He is looked upon more favorably than the church goers, yet he is still in the upper ranges of society... so he must be sneaky and crafty.
Clerk-he's poor, skinny, frail, smart, and pathetic. He cares only for his books and even starves his horse in order to pay for his education. He doesn't have a job because all he wants to do is read. Chaucer does not like him because Chaucer is rational, he likes men who work and earn a living as an honest man does. Furthermore this person probably talked about how much he loved and had and knew books. aka was really egocentric, i would have hated him too.
Sergeant at law- a fair and knowledgeable judge, the sergeant at law is accredited with never having made a judgment which could be questioned. He wears a homely coat and although is described in only 2 lines Chaucer says that is enough. Obviously this mans persona is much more important and powerful. Chaucer respects him possibly above all others for he is of a nobler class yet not obsessed with the material.
Franklin-the sheriff, he is concerned only with food. Is described as having virtually every type of food imaginable and loves to party, as his house is free for the county. Very courtly, he is described as the ideal of the gentry, whom Chaucer happens to despise.
haberdasher/carpenter/weaver/dyer/tapestry maker- men of a guild, described only physically. They carry incredibly fine materials and silver. yet there are two references to their feminine features, that they should be treated like a queen, and called madame. Chaucer must think the are sissies.
cook-an unclean cook with an ulcer on his knee, yet skilled in the arts of the culinary. the cook is described as being able to do anything in the kitchen yet he has an ulcer which could be used to show his uncleanliness or perhaps that he is one of the few good honest workers and has a deformity. This could fit into the disparity and difference between the rich and poor and the unfairness between them which appears to be present in this book.
shipman- a violent, unforgiving man, yet a brilliant navigator at sea. Chaucer is wary of this fellow, his weapon is described as "hanging free" and he is willing to put enemies to death rather than keep them as prisoners. Through this though Chaucer still respects him because he is a worker "tanned brown"
doctor of medicine-an excellent doctor, yet he is greedy. He is also described as never reading the bible, so why is he going on this pilgrimage? He appears to not believe in god for he is a man of science yet he looks to the stars to cure his patients.
wife of bath -a woman who sexes her husbands to death. She is finely dressed and courtly. She is described as knowing loves oldest dances and having been to Jerusalem three times. Chaucer feels that she is elegant and perhaps even attracted to her, yet he also points out her hidden large hips and gaped teeth.
parson-
plowman
miller
manciple
reeve
summoner
pardoner
host

Thursday, November 5, 2009

1.) The story can be viewed as a story from life to death and back in two different ways, the castle can be viewed as a part of the fairy or underground, or gawain's faith can be seen as being tested, killed and reborn.
2.) Sir Gawain is reborn physically because he thought he was dead, he truly believed the green knight was going to cut off his head. By fulfilling his debt to the green knight he is able to be reborn. Spiritually he is reborn because throughout the book he is slowly losing his faith. At the beginning he prays often and worships his shield, however by the end he resorts to magic. After the green knight tells him of his trap, he resorts back to his belief in god and the virgin mary.
3.) You are supposed to feel sorry for Sir Gawain. The author intends the reader to view Sir Gawain as a perfectionist, an honorable knight who is determined to follow his vows. Gawain stands not only as an archtypical knight to help to encourage chivalry and faith among other knights, but more importantly a symbol of determination. He is determined to be a perfect knight, but due to his nature is unable to attain it.
4.) We will not see great deeds from Gawain again, his temper gets in his way. This is his flaw, his frustration. Because of this he will not recover from the embarrassment he felt at the hands of the green knight. He will attempt to carry on and strive for perfection, but will always remember his failings more than his deeds.
5.) The green knight is in control, if Morgana was in control and her plan was to scare/kill lady Guinivere, she would have no reason to release Sir Gawain from his bond. She would have put Sir Gawain to death and hoped his death would have destroyed lady Guinivere.

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

1) Compare each of the hunting scenes with the bedroom scenes in the castle. Explain how the hunting scenes symbolize what is going on in the bedroom and explore how the differ animals hunted relate to the different tactics used by the lady each day.
the three different days and three different hunts relate to the three ways in which the lady attempts to take advantage of Gawain. The first hunt is for does, which represents the femininity in Gawain. The lady attempts flattering Gawain's manners and chivalry. This is what Gawain is most famous for, and the most obvious way to his bed, however she is unsuccessful. The second hunt is for the boar, a massive beast which destroys dogs and men. This animal represents the manliness in Gawain, and while the king is succesful the lady fails again. She attempts to flatter his masculinity, saying that he could take any woman he wanted, by force if necessary. The third hunt is for the fox a master of cleverness and mischief. The woman's hunt reflects this, she offers her ring, which is refused but at the offering of the green girdle, Gawain can not refuse. Finally the lady is successful in getting Gawain to break his vows, if only partly. For she is tricking him into worshiping false idol, putting faith in magic rather than in God.

Thursday, October 29, 2009

English-sleep does not=A

1.)Basically even though the green giant has come into Arthur’s court embarrassed the knights and promised to cut of Gawain’s head, everything’s going on as usual. Describes the on-goings of winter and spring and helps to portray Camelot as a place of games and merriment.

2.)Another passing of time, summer passes and fall begins. Gawain begins to prepare to leave

3.)On Halloween Gawain leaves Arthur again on a day of feasting. “Kind or sever we must engage our fate”

4.)Gawain’s armor and clothing are described in unusually great detail. Nothing else happens.

5.)Last thing Gawain does to prepare before leaving is go to Mass. Shows Gawain’s devotion to Christianity and his lord. Again there is more describing of his armor and horses. He also says “gave them good-day for evermore, he though”

6.)Perhaps mocks the silliness of the games and Arthurs court, all men and women are deeply saddened to see Gawain go, and it is stated that the king should not have heeded the counsel of a capricious knight in the nonsense of a Christmas game.

7.)Describes the godforsaken places in which Gawain seeks the green knight. States that his travel is “no game” in comparison to king Arthur’s court. No-one knows where the green chapel is.

8.)He fights dragons, wolves, Wodwos, bulls, bears, boars and giants, but his victory is credited to his faith in god. Also includes his battle against cold winter. He might have prevented this by getting out of his mettle armor.

9.)On Christmas he rides through a hazel and hawthorn thicket, he is utterly miserable and afraid he will not be able to pray in a holy place on Christmas. So he prays to Mary.

10.)HIS PRAYERS ARE ANSWERED!He thanked Jesus and saint Julian and went to the castle. It just goes to show the power of the Lord… or does it?

11.) The castle is described as incredibly elegant, compared to a paper toy- another reference to games or childlike passions.

12.) Gawain Is received by the porter in exceedingly high honor, although he has not even introduced himself. The castle people kneel to him, welcome him into the castle, assist him in the removal of his armor, and lead him to a fire.

13.) Gawain meets the lord of the castle- a large man in his prime. Like the green knight his beard, legs, and fierce eyes are described. He is then taken to his private chambers again spoiled tremendously.

14.) more descriptions of his extravagant room, he appears to not have gone to mass yet, though this would have been the first thing expected. He has washed and eaten already.

15.)Finally they learn that it is Gwain in front of them, and as a knight of the round table he is treated with even MORE honor and renown. The members of the hall praise god for their good luck at sending Gawain the good mannered to their castle in Christmas time.

16.) The lady leaves for the chapel after dinner and Gawain follows her, it seems like he is more willing to follow her than to go to church. In the church, he meets the lady formally. She is beautiful, her old hag: nasty.

17.) Gawain treats the lady with honor, and asks the lord his permission to approach and kiss the lady. Then there is more games: the lord offers his hood to anyone who makes the best Christmas game.

18.) Christmas morning, the ugly woman is served at the head of the table for unknown reasons. Gawain and the lady converse “without innuendo”, which is good he’s known her for all of a day and she’s married. However it is said that their speech outdoes all other lords. She is clearly educated, or perhaps under some spell.

19.)Gawain believes he must go, for he has to continue his quest for the green chapel. The king tells him how honored he is to have served him on gods day.

20.) The lord asks why he must leave in the middle of the festivities and Gawain describes his quest. At which, the lord is ecstatic because he knows of the green chapel. Gawain may stay for a few more days.

21.)The lord converses with Gawain and the lady, and tells Gawain that the lady shall keep him company. Gawain is again honorable and says he will do whatever the lord dictates as he is staying in his home.

22.) The bargain is struck between the lord and Gawain. The ending verse is disturbing, “he knew very well, that lord, how to draw out his game.” Leads the reader to think that there is more to this game than meets the eye.

2) Look at the motif of games and discuss how it works in this section.
Games seem to be commonplace in this era, especially around Christmas time. The motif of games is used to create a situational irony. Gawain is going to have his head chopped off, so he might as well enjoy himself and be merry! The motif of games occurs often in the second fit: from the waving crowds as Gawain leaves the castle saying that who had heard of a king listening to a capricous knight on christmass games, gawains time in the forest being described as no game, the lady and Gawain's "witty-wordplay", and finaly the dukes great bargain with Gawain. These are used not only as ironic devices, but also to present tests to gawain's character. Similar to Chuchulain when the warrior gives up on his oaths is when he is struck

3) Other than the pentangle describe a symbol in this section and relate it to a theme. Discuss how this symbol reinforces the theme.

Another symbol in the second fit of Gawain is that of Birds. Birds represent magic, wisdom, and evil. These are very pagan things, and the antithesis of Gawain's morals. The birds can also be seen to be scrying for Morgan, as they are often seen watching Gawain. The birds are described in the wilderness as well as around the Green knight, but not in the castle. This could be because Morgan is in the castle and does not need the birds.
4) How is Gawain different in this section .as compared to the last?

Gawain is slowly loosing his faith in christianity, and resorting to paganism. More importantly is the self image he creates. In Camelot, Gawain presents himself as low and sub-servant to his king and other knights, while in the castle however, he presents himself as a magnificent knight deserving of the most high honor. Although this may not be apparent, the lowly Gawain would have objected to those kneeling before him and being treated to the highest spot on the table.

5) Discuss the setting

There are two settings: that of the wilderness, and that of the castle. they are complete opposites except that games are presented in both. In the wilderness Gawain meets hostile pagans, he is confronted by dragons and beasts, sleeps on the hard rocks, and suffers from the cold. As soon as he enters the castle he is met with a fire, a warm bed, friends all around him, and is able to pray at a chapel. However, the wilderness is described as "no game" but there are still challenges. The beasts are all tests of his courage and strength, which he passes easily. The castle represents a much deeper game, a test of his faith. he does not pass this test as he is unable to give the scarf to the lord


Friday, October 23, 2009

hrolf kraki

The role of kings:
Through all the stories, we have read thus far, there are many kings. By analyzing their strengths and weaknesses, we can determine what makes a good king, and what makes a bad king. Furthermore, we can assess what role the king should take in the governing of his community.
In Hrolf Kraki, there are numerous kings, both good and bad. Hrolf I believe is a good king, because he is wise and well mannered, not too eager to fight, but not a coward either. Frodi is a terrible king. He kills his brother takes over the land acts dishonorably to all and rules with an iron fist. So he dies. In betwixt these two is the father of Bjorn whose name escapes me. He is unwilling to confront the queen on her misdeeds, but does not cause mayhem either. Eventually though she’s bound and dragged throughout the streets.
The role of warriors
Warriors are especially important to Hrolf Kraki because everyone is a warrior… at least if they are not a woman, or a god. Warriors must defend their honor, serve their lord, and protect the king as well as gaining fame. Obviously Bodvar is an example of warriors in Hrolf Kraki, along with his brother Elk-frodi, Hjalti, and Svipdag as well. Elk-frodi is a terrible warrior who is self-centered and cares only or the material, yet he swears to avenge his brother’s death. Hjalti at first is a pathetic excuse of a warrior, but after gaining immense courage becomes one of the foremost among kin Hrolf’s champions. Svipdag is also an excellent warrior although he leaves his country of origin, this Is excusable because king Adils treated him badly and dishonored him.
Women are evil
The role of women is to cause mayhem and destruction, or to create peace between nations. Powerful women prefer the former. Yrsa displays the correct female behavior, obedient. Although she talks out against her king she does nothing, even when he kills her father/lover. The only action she takes is to give her son a little bonus to her rightful inheritance. On the other hand Sculd demonstrates the evil intentions of women by using her magical elfin bloodlines to gain the powers of sorcery, keep an army on its feet, kill hrolf, and summon a magical boar. Why? Because she’s a woman!
MAGIC!
Magic kills people. Why is there no healing, uniting, fun-loving magic? Because it’s FROM THE DEVIL THAT’S WHY! Oh wait that was Beowulf, this poem has no Christianity (I think). BECAUSE ITS FROM THE UNDERWORLD THAT’S WHY! Magic is used to represent power, and personally I think it is more a reflection on intuition then actual magic. Perhaps Adils was a con-artist and a trickster rather than a sorcerer. Perhaps Sculd was just a brilliant tactician rather than summoning the dead.
Revenge:
Revenge is present in these types of stories because they were so honor bound that they felt they needed to seek revenge even for many of the smallest insults. For example, Hjorvard does not want to pay tribute… so he ambushes, torches, and destroys the kingdom. Olaf shaves Helgi, Helgi rapes Olaf, Olaf makes Helgi disgrace himself, it’s a never ending cycle which only escalates until they are putting dead squirrels on each others horses. Clearly this shows revenge and the destructive nature of it, for neither side benefits from their revenge, they are only embarrassed.
Hospitality:
Hospitality is related to honor, those who are honorable are also hospitable. Those who try and set you afire are not. King Adils ambushes them, calls a true, sets them afire, and then runs away. He is not hospitable. King Hrolf is. He brings in Bodvar and welcomes him, although that could be because he threw one of his men into the air and destroyed some of his berserkers. Still, King-Hrolf welcomes him when many of his men urged him not to do so. Elk-Frodi is inhospitable, when his brothers come to his residence, he slams a sword into the bench their sitting on, and then wrestles them, and then stamps a puddle into a stone.
3) Discuss one event in the story that seems to represent what you believe the book to be about.
I believe the main story of the book is revenge and when its appropriate. Olaf’s revenge on King Helgi is cruel and leads to her embarrassment. King Helgi also embarrasses himself by marrying his daughter. No good comes out of either revenge. However, avenging (another form of revenge) is honorable and benefits those who have the courage to undertake it. Hroar and Helgi avenge their father and become kings. Also Bodvar avenges his father against the evil queen Hvit, for which he is not cursed, or tricked into sleeping with her daughter.

4) How do Hrolf and is champions compare with Arthur and the round table?
King Hrolf’s champions are less equal to their king than Arthur’s. Whereas King Hrolf rules over them at the head of the table, King Arthur sits among them. Both kings use their men better then Beowulf though.
8) Compare Hrolf Kraki to Beowulf.
Hrolf Kraki is very different to Beowulf, although they are faced with very similar challenges. Both have dragons come to their country, but whereas Beowulf fights and dies, Hrolf Kraki hides. Beowulf has Ofermod, while Hrolf Kraki is almost too coward-like. This is shown again when Hrolf kraki is willing to disguise himself when he is in King Adil’s court, this is very dishonorable and something Beowulf never would.

Sunday, October 18, 2009

EPIC ESSAY AS OF SUNDAY!!

EPIC BEOWULF ESSAY

INTRO TO COLLEGE ENGLISH

QUINN WEBER

10/18/09

Zachary Weber
Period 3
EPIC ESSAYBEOWULF10/15/09
1.)The author and HIS times
The exact date of Beowulf is unknown, the legends of Beowulf are debated as fact or fiction, the poem itself is subject to debate (should it be studied for literary merit or historical fact?), its classification as poem is challenged, even the author of Beowulf is unknown; yet, for all this Beowulf is considered an important piece and is studied internationally by literary scholars and English students alike. This is because of the unique and profound times in which the story was recorded and the interesting blend of the Christian and pagan faiths.
Beowulf is perhaps a Danish or Swedish legend, and perhaps an accounting of a great warrior: a tale from Northern Europe of great deeds and men. Whether the poem is fact or fiction is irrelevant, as somehow this story came to enter the oral tradition of the warmongering Viking people.
The Vikings conducted raids on England from the time of 793AD when Norsemen destroyed the abbey on Lindisfarne and continued until almost 1100 AD. However at about 850, a shift occurred in the Vikings. They began to settle among the English people marrying into local families, giving up there warlike ways to settle as farmers, and most importantly adopting the local religion: Christianity.
Until the Vikings settled in England, they believed in a pagan religion which focused on the glory of ones earthly deed. Only brave warriors could ascend to Valhalla where they would dine among the gods until the day of Ragnarok when they would fight the giants alongside their gods… and lose. This pagan culture is noted in the text of Beowulf obviously in the culture of the warriors that are shown. Beowulf fights Grendel, his mother, and the dragon for honor so he will be granted access to Valhalla. Those who flee from battle are banished even though they were only trying to save their own lives. Even more importantly is the reference to the giants. They are referred to as the ancient race that built the dragon’s lair, and the makers of the sword with which Beowulf slew the hag.
The poem also contains a number of Christian components as well; Beowulf often cries out to “his lord” or states that he was destined to win the battle because of God. I believe that these are in fact inserts that have been placed in the story to accommodate the English peoples Christian culture. Thus the story would have been written down by some English monk or high-person. In this time the ability to read and write was a very rare skill, few outside of the clergy were capable of writing at all let alone transcribing a poem hundreds of lines long. Thus Beowulf must not be treated lightly for it was most likely someone’s life work to record. A member of the clergy who supplemented the story so that it could be better understood among the English people and would spread the Christian faith.
As mentioned earlier the Vikings had begun to settle into England, perhaps the Christian translation of this poem is not an attempt at enabling the English to access it, but rather a way of converting the Vikings into Christians. Monk would have a keen desire to do this because previously the pagan Vikings had been a raider of churches, often selling monks into slavery.
Thus Beowulf in my opinion is an ancient story of the Vikings, a fairy tale perhaps or an accounting of a great warrior which during the conquests of Anglo-Saxon England was transcribed by a Christian influence. Although attempting to use this great poem as a tool for Christianity, the pagan influences are still apparent in subtle details.

2. Form/structure/plot
Like everything else in Beowulf the structure of the piece is under debate. The easy way of analyzing the poem is that it is an escalation of the three battles climaxing in Beowulf’s death. However, in Beowulf there are a number of side-stories which seem to be inconsequential to the main story, they do not further the plot and in my opinion would have been dropped out of oral tradition over the years if they were unimportant. Thus, I believe that these transgressions presented within the poem are actually a telling of important times and a shifting of powers between three cultures: the Danes, the Geats, and the Swedes. This is the true meaning and story of Beowulf.
If you believe, as I do, that Beowulf is truly the story of 3 nations then the structure of the poem is very complex. After all not many poems focus on the unimportant and leave the important to the outskirts. This complex method is used to hide certain aspects of the poem from certain people. The story as an oral poem, was passed down by tradition, the simple action could be appreciated by the young; those preparing to go to war. The more subtle story of the nations would not be picked up by these young men. However, the elderly and battle weary would pick up on this delicate theme. In this way the poem made a sad comment on the aspects of war to those who had experienced it, while at the same time inspiring the young to go to battle, fight to the death, and die for heroic glory.
In order to make this undertone subtly apparent, the poet used a number of foreshadowing and sequencing techniques. Foreshadowing is especially important because the reader is never actually told whether or not the nations will fall or succeed, the destinies of the nations are only hinted at. The poet hints that the Danes will fall in a story told in the hall of Herot, that the Geats will fall at the funeral of Beowulf, and that the Swedes will rise in the stories told of the wars against the Swedes. This is more easily shown in how each nation reacts when it is under stress. The Danes are unable to defend their hall, they must turn to Beowulf. The Geats are unable to defend themselves from the dragon, they must turn to Wiglaf. While the Swedes fight on their own and valiantly, they fight to the last man against the invading Geats, and only due to Beowulf’s prowess are defeated. Again this subtle hinting helps to hide the true nature of war from the young and naïve.
The way the story is sequenced is also important, after every battle there is a feast, celebration, or gathering of some kind, at which stories and speeches are made. These stories for the most part constitute the transgressions. After Beowulf slays Grendel it is hinted “The Shielding nation was not yet familiar with feud and betrayal” pg 67 and the tale of betrayal between the Frisians and Danish is told. After Beowulf kills Grendel’s mother, Hrothgar foreshadows the falling of the Geats by describing the dangers of power also in a number of stories told when Beowulf returns home the tale of the rising Swedes is told. Lastly after Beowulf’s fight with the dragon the fall of the Geat people is imminent and foretold by the new SWEDISH king of the Geat people: Wiglaf.
In a short summary, Beowulf a Geat travels to Denmark to confront Grendel who has been terrorizing Heorot. He ambushes Grendel and easily defeats him in hand to hand combat. At the feast afterwards, the fall of the Danes is predicted. Next Beowulf fights Grendel’s mother in her own lair after she avenges her son’s death on Herot. This time his sword fails and he must use an ancient weapon which he finds in the hag’s lair. He is protected by his mail and returns unscathed. When Beowulf returns home and in a number of intercalary chapters, the rise of the Swedes is foreseen. Lastly Beowulf fights the dragon after it is awoken by a slave, he must again venture into his enemies lair, and again his weapon fails him. His men all abandon him with the exception of Wiglaf, who helps him to slay the dragon. Beowulf is mortally wounded and makes Wiglaf king of Geatland. Ironically Wiglaf is a Swede. Wiglaf then tells of how Geatland will be overrun by Swedes because the Geats have no courage or champions.

3.) Point of View/ Perspective
The poem Beowulf has an odd point of perspective and point of view. The majority of the poem is written in third person omniscient. The reader hovers over Beowulf’s shoulder, yet at times will jump to happening which Beowulf could not possibly have knowledge (unless of course he’s Jesus) Assuming for simplicity sake that Beowulf is not Jesus, the perspective of the poem is still very interesting. Furthermore the way in which the main themes and ideas are presented to Beowulf is very simple.
Beowulf simply seems to run into important ideas and themes. For example he presents the theme of role of kings and warriors by being a king and a warrior: a terrible king and an excellent warrior. Many themes are presented in this simple approach including Christianity vs. paganism, life and death, and the warrior culture. The narrator has no need to make insights himself on these topics as Beowulf experiences them first hand.
The perspective does shift somewhat when in dialogue with other characters. While Beowulf is speaking with people, the narrator will stop making comments, focusing on what is being said. Whereas when Beowulf is alone especially during times of action, the narrator continues a steady stream of babble on Beowulf’s every movement. “Beowulf got ready, donned his war-gear, indifferent to death; his mighty, hand-forged, fine webbed mail would soon meet with the menace underwater.”
The point of view is also never afraid to jump ahead of Beowulf, portraying and oncoming danger, in fact the point of view leaves the hero immediately before he fights each on of the monsters. Portraying Grendel crashing through the forest, the sea-hag slithering out of her lair, and the dragon outraged at his stolen treasure. The normal view from just behind the warrior is acceptable for most occasions because that is where the most action is occurring, however these jumps are used to build suspense and anticipation for the upcoming battle. Like a screen shot of the two combatants prior to the fight.

4.) Character
Beowulf has no character, at least not one that the reader is ever made aware of. The poet never delves into the reasons behind Beowulf’s actions. In fact Beowulf is never even described physically. Instead the reader comes into contact with the character that is Beowulf through his actions and words alone. Even though we follow Beowulf from his rising to the time of his death, a time period of over 50 years, he still remains highly undeveloped. He remains the powerful warrior: deadly yet mysterious.
The story follows him from his rise to glory all the way to his demise, though it skips the 50 years in which he became king, defeated nations single handedly, and defended the nation with his reputation… apparently because they were unexciting. However this 50 year gap is filled in tales of what has occurred, the reader is simply not allowed to be there when it takes place. After spending all this time with Beowulf he remains an enigma. We assume that he fights Grendel to gain honor and glory, but there is also mention of his father’s debt to Hrothgar. We assume that he kills the hag to avenge Hrothgar, yet couldn’t it be some Christian crusade of ridding the world of Cain’s influence? In truth nothing is known about why Beowulf performs his actions, and thus nothing is known about his true personality.
Now take a look at what is known about Beowulf. His name is a keening for bee-hunter, meaning the bear, which is important in the ancient northern European culture as a symbol of power and courage. Beowulf appears to be an archetype warrior: fearless, powerful, and eager for glory. However, he fails as a king to provide security for his country after his death. This is one main purpose of Beowulf, to show what makes a good king and a bad king, but also to show the different qualities of a warrior and king. Again as an oral tale Beowulf works on two levels, warning the elderly of a flaw in kings, while at the same time telling children of a magnificent warrior.
Beowulf is rarely described by the narrator, instead he is commented on by characters, his actions and his words. However what is perhaps the most direct comment on his personality is made by the narrator in the closing lines of the poem. “They said that of al the kings upon he earth he was the man most gracious and fair-minded, kindest to his people and keenest to win fame.” pg 213 This shows the difference between king and warrior, for a king is not supposed to be so kind to his people that they never have to fight o become hardened warriors. He was always ready to earn the fame which should have been his champions. This was his tragic flaw his interaction with others.
The people who surround Beowulf are treated with a similar lack of detail. In fact there are virtually no physical descriptions of people in the poem. This may tie into the culture of the times, and how people were judged on their heroic deeds rather than their nationality or looks. However there are a few exceptions to the lack of physical descriptions, most importantly in what the people wear. Their armor, swords, and weapons are described often brilliantly. This is because these facts DO relate to culture, and the deeds which warriors have done. Swords especially are a symbol of power and rank as you must have either wealth enough to have one made or killed someone who had such power. Armor too was expensive, and showed rank as well as shields, especially those made of metal.
For example take the character Unferth. He is revealed as a coward, because he did not defend the hall against Grendel, a drunkard in his speech against Beowulf. Beowulf calls him a kin-killer. He is also later revealed to have a magnificent sword named Hrunting, logically he must be a fairly powerful warrior to possess such a sword. He is not ever described but his deeds are hinted at, and his character can be analyzed in his speech, many important things about each character can be discovered by analyzing close details. In this way the characters of Beowulf are unveiled.

5.) Setting
Ancient Denmark, Sweden, and Norway: this is where Beowulf takes place. In the depths of a hell-like hall to the golden feasting place, Herot and the magnificent treasure hoard of the dragon. The story spans three nations, each of which has its own distinct feel and atmosphere. Each of these places are intricately woven into each other, paralleling or supplementing each other in a tie more intricate than the most complicated Celtic knot.
The first important is Heorot. “The hall of halls. Heorot was the name he had settled on it, whose utterance was law.” Pg 7 Heorot is a place of heaven on earth, where literally no evil is meant to be done. The king promised even not give out “common land” or “people’s lives”, both of which were common practices in these days. Yet the attempted perfect-ness of the hall is spoiled by the inability of the Danish to defend it, their weakness is seen as a failure to their king. Even though many stand to fight Grendel, none survive. Thus an air of the hall when Beowulf arrives is that of failure, distress, and anxiety. The people are on edge and wary of outsiders. After Beowulf defeats Grendel, the hall returns to some normalcy, it becomes again a place of feasting and honor. Heorot is important because it shows how a good king should conduct his hall, the warriors are there to defend the king, the king is there to reward and praise the warriors. Yet by failing to defend itself even with an army of men inside, Heorot can be seen as a failure of the warrior culture and perhaps a negative comment on war.
The second location is Grendel’s mother’s lair. Because her family can not enjoy the pleasures of men, they seek solitude in an underground palace. The hall is described in the following lines “he saw firelight, a gleam and flare-up, a glimmer of brightness” pg105 The brilliant hall parallels Heorot, a shining star in the field of darkness. The parallels continue, Grendel’s mother comes to avenge her son’s death just as Beowulf avenges the death of Aschere, perhaps neither of them were necessarily evil, only acting out of honor. The hag’s hall is important to the story because it promotes the theme of courage and honor. No other man has ever been able to dive to the hall. Beowulf is forced to resort to a weapon in this hall, although his fails him (a theme of the poem). The various places and ways in which Beowulf is able to triumph is a way of showing how great of a warrior he is.
The final location is the hoard of the dragon. In Beowulf’s homeland, this dragon fight is the antithesis of Beowulf’s fight with Grendel. Again the hall is magnificent, and underground just as the hag’s lair was. Beowulf has to go into the dragon’s lair, carrying a weapon, which fails him; he even brings back-up… whom also fail him. Each of these settings are important as they show the escalating battles which Beowulf undertakes.

6.) Theme.
An epic and important piece of literary work such as Beowulf will present many central themes ranging from the meshing of Christianity vs. Paganism to the trivial, fleeting nature of life and death. One theme I found to be particularly interesting was the devastating nature of war, and how it affects not only warriors, but those who are left behind. In Beowulf the warriors go out with the thought and perhaps intention of dying, of doing great deeds. As long as they fight they win, for if they are stricken down they will go to Valhalla, and if they strike down their opponents they will have done a great deed. So who is really losing the wars?
The women and children who stayed at home, the elders to old to fight: these are the people who bare the true brunt of war. The lands of the fallen are claimed by their enemies and the women are left to fend for themselves, defenseless they are often times raped and sold into slavery. This is even more painful for the women in these cultures because their purpose was to act as keepers of the peace. Thus although the men were dying for honor, the women living in shame were the ones suffering from war.
In Beowulf the theme of women and war is made apparent through a number of transgressions. The tale of Hildeburgh, the Danish princess, is especially notable. She loses her son and her brother Hnaef in a single battle. “she, the woman in shock waylaid by grief, Hok’s daughter how could she not lament her fate when morning came and the light broke on her murdered dears?”(pg 73) This clearly shows the negative effects of war on women, their defenders and family are destroyed. Furthermore their purpose in life is to unite nations as peacekeepers. The devastation of war on women is shown again at Beowulf’s funeral a woman is seen “A Geat woman too sang out in grief; with hair bound up, she unburdened herself of her worst fears, a wild litany o nightmare and lament: her nation invaded, enemies on the rampage, bodies in piles, slavery and abasement.”
The theme was most likely implanted in the poem Beowulf by a man who saw these terrible happenings, some wise scop or elder-man. They intended the poem to be used against war-mongerers, yet they had to be sly. War was a widely accepted and noble past time, and speaking out against it would not have been appreciated by all. So Beowulf became a double edged sword, telling of great deeds to the young, and warning of war to the old.

7.) Critical Review
The Defense of Heorot: Resisting the Attack on Human Solidarity
Heorot Hall has fallen into despair. A loathsome beast has ravaged the Danish town center. A confident hero comes and proclaims himself defender of the hall. Comparing components of this story with those countless archived children’s tales stored away in our memories, we must ask
ourselves if there is something more universal and more essential to the human condition here than meets the eye. What is this hall that it draws the valiant warrior Beowulf across ancient feud lines to offer his mighty sword and impose his will upon any and all offenders? What does the hideous beast seek to destroy that is so genuinely valued by the Danes and the Geats alike?Beowulf stands up as protector of something much deeper than the mere surface expectations of the reader for bravery and honor; he passionately fights to protect the deep solidarity that Heorot represents for humanity. Viewing Grendel’s assault on this human solidarity, we must conclude that the value of the hall regarding international relations and the power of the human spirit is that for which Beowulf must so ardently fight. Heorot Hall represents the togetherness and fellowship of all peoples; a true monument to the oneness of the human spirit. “Far and wide through the world, I have heard, / orders for work to adorn that wall stead / were sent to many peoples. And soon it stood there, / finished and ready, in full view, / the hall of halls…” (7). Hrothgar, the newly appointed ruler of the Danes, sent orders to the known world for the construction of a great hall. With great gusto, laborers from around the world came to “adorn the wallstead” and to place their mark as a remembrance of the fellowship that would be contained within the very walls of Heorot.
It is no great stretch of the imagination to therefore conclude that Beowulf, upon hearing of the threat against Heorot, took it upon himself to stage a defense against him who would destroy the very building that for the people represented the deep solidarity of the human spirit. The
beast who would perpetrate such a vile act therefore cannot merely bare the image of some mindless ogre springing from our endless archive of childhood stories, but rather one who would seek to destroy the very foundation of the essence of togetherness. “So Grendel ruled in defiance of right, / one against all, until the greatest house / in the world stood empty, a deserted wall stead/” (11). In these very words we see three aspects of the true nature of the beast which draw our attention to the fundamental character of his loathsome being. First, he rules “in defiance of right“, as though the values by which the whole of humanity is governed were in fact the bane of his existence. Secondly, he stands one against all, clearly demonstrating his isolation and profound hatred for togetherness. “It harrowed him / to hear the din of the loud banquet / every day in the hall…” (9). The sound of men conversing and laughing together in community strikes deep into the chasm of the soul of the beast and urges him to rise up for the slaughter. Thirdly, the hall stood empty and the wallstead which bore the countless marks of laborers from all over the world stood in shambles. We now see Grendel’s purpose in assaulting the famed hall: to bring emptiness where there was once fullness and to divide what was once united. The emptiness of the hall is a sad contrast to the rejoicing and fellowship that took place the night before, and the high walls that once proudly bore the names of all of the nations no longer stand. For this very reason the Geats did not hesitate in sending their most valiant warrior to stand up in the face of the threat against the human spirit. “Then news of Grendel, / hard to ignore, reached me at home: / sailors brought stories of the plight you suffer / in this legendary hall, how it lies deserted, / empty and useless once the evening light / hides itself under heaven’s dome. / So every elder and experienced councilman / among my people supported my resolve / to come here to you…” (29).Beowulf, defender of the people, takes up the charge against him who would break the wallstead of togetherness and destroy the international symbol of human unity.
Heorot is ravaged, the wallstead is deserted and there are no longer men filling the rafters with laughter and the strains of the harp. This wonderful monument to the united spirit of all men stands deserted and empty, while Grendel delights in his success in bringing destruction upon the
world’s fellowship center. The only glimmer of hope comes from the north, from the Geats, who have sent their most heroic warrior to wage war against the one who would commit such a crime against the human spirit. Standing against the face of evil, Beowulf protects the united community of man and does not allow the division and emptiness that are born from the soul of the vile beast Grendel to ravage the halls of Heorot any longer. Resisting Grendel’s savage attack on human solidarity, Beowulf takes up the defense of Heorot and the case of every nation whose name was so poignantly placed upon the high walls of this great hall of men.
Young, David. "The Defense of Heorot: Resisting the Attack on Human Solidarity." A Critical Analysis of Beowulf (2006). Web. 17 Oct. 2009 .
David Young skillfully argues that Beowulf comes to Heorot to protect it because it is a symbol of international piece. He calls upon specific details including the multi-national work force used to construct Heorot, and makes many incites into why Grendel is attacking there. However I feel he has failed to understand the times in which Beowulf occurs. A building designed to represent international peace is all well and good in an age where today we can sit down at the UN, and talk diplomatically, where most of our religions call for a peaceful life and ascent to heaven, where our culture no longer calls for heroic deeds and epic adventures, but what David Young fails to account for is that this was not the mentality a warrior 1500 years ago would have had.
Beowulf fought for Hrothgar for honor whether for him or to avenge his father’s debt is debatable. Beowulf himself states over and over again how he will win glory by defeating Grendel. Furthermore if he was there to protect the hall as a symbol of peace, he would not have needed to chase down and kill Grendel’s mother, who was only avenging her son’s death. Look at how the dead are treated, Beowulf takes of the heads of his victims and parades them back to Heorot, is this a man who wanted or cared about international peace? No. Instead Beowulf kills these two creatures to enhance his fame and reputation, which he is most proud of. If you may have any doubt of this read Beowulf’s boasting about how he swam for 7 days in full armor, and your doubts shall be quelled.
Although this interpretation presents a new look at Beowulf’s motives it fails to account the warrior tradition which is apparent in these times. David Young has clearly not studied the Viking religion, the constant doom and ultimate failure they believed in, as well as the fall of Valhalla. A culture which believes that their entire world both material and supernatural is doomed and the only way to “survive” is to be sang of would not care if a hall was erected to glorify international peace. In fact they’d probably ransack it.
8.) Diction
Seamus Heaney used a simple style when translating Beowulf. In his introduction he said that he wanted to focus on the readability of the piece rather than the direct translation, he’d rather have an enjoyable poem than an accurate one. Yet, Seamus Heaney is still able to transplant many interesting word choices into the poem. He writes the narrator’s script in a way which although plain and simple during times of peace, becomes very excited and quickens during times of action. The dialogue of the characters too changes depending on the action.
Most of the characters speak in an elevated form, but as Beowulf does not encounter a wide range characters which speak to him, it is hard to determine if this is a mark of education or status. He seems to only associate with warriors, kings, and those whom party at the mead halls. These respected people appear to have an elevated language; they use flowery imagery. “He will carry me away as he goes to ground, gorged and bloodied; he will run gloating with my raw corpse.” (Pg 31) Descriptions like these are common in the dialogue of the poem when describing action and, as the poem seems to be obsessed with war and battle, are found frequently.
The narrator changes pace during these times as well. During times of peace he uses less imagery focusing solely on the actions of the characters. Events happen at a descent pace, but they do not have the same tension as the action scenes. During peace time “the warriors rose quickly, impatient to be off: their own country was beckoning the nobles; and the bold voyager longed to be aboard his distant boat.”(page 125) compare this to “with that the old lord sprang to his feed and praised God for Beowulf’s pledge. Then a bit and halter were brought for his horse with the plaited mane. The wise king mounted the royal saddle and rod out in style with a force of shield –bearers.” (pg 97) Both excerpts are those of the men preparing to move, but during the time of action, the narrator uses descriptions to bring the reader in, and short, intense sentences to build anticipation.
Their dialogue changes when characters believe they are at peace. “He will not let you down. Should you die before him, he will eat our children truly and fairly.” (Pg 83) The queen speaks of the death of the king, and the heir to the throne, yet she does so in what appears to be a calm manner. This is how the dialogue of peace-time seems to go in Beowulf, slow and dreary with no detailed descriptions, no change in pace, luckily for the reader there is not much peace-time.
10.) Tone
The majority of Beowulf, as translated by Seamus Heaney, is concerned with either preparation for battle or battle itself. Even before the geats land, they are preparing to fight Grendel, once they have they are given a short respite before preparing to fight His mother. After that again the 50 years in which Beowulf is king is ignored and his preparation for battle with the dragon becomes the focus of the poem. The impression of constantly being on edge and ready for the next attack is what stuck in my mind the most after reading Beowulf. With this, the tone of the piece can only be described as anxious-battle ready.
Even with Beowulf so clam and collected, it is hard not to become agitated and excited anticipating the next battle. The point of view does nothing to help this as it also jumps ahead to the terrifying opponent, giving a frightful image of the enemy preparing for battle. “The dragon began to belch out flames and burn bright homesteads; there was a hot glow that scared everyone, for the vile sky-winger would leave nothing alive in his wake.” (pg 157) Beowulf routinely prepares his armor, weapons, and men and marches on the dragon. Yet even when using what should be soothing lines, “proud” “no dread at all” “scant regard”, the reader is left with the definite feeling of the “calm before the storm”.
“Beowulf, son of Ecgtheow, spoke:
“wise sir, do not grieve. It is always better
To avenge dear ones than to indulge in mourning.
For every one of us, living in this world
means waiting for our end. Let whoever can
Win glory before death. When a warrior is gone,
that will be his best and only bulwark.
So arise, my lord and let us immediately
set forth on the trail of this troll-dam.” (Pg 97)
In this passage Beowulf again appears calm, yet he is talking of avenging the dead, of glory and death. The narrator and king are not so calm as Beowulf, the narrator describes the hot gore, wallowing up with apparent fear. Who could blame him?
Even the settings of the poem help to establish this anxiety. The poem takes place in either halls of demonic creatures, or halls in which attack is expected. Heorot is under siege by Grendel, the Hag’s lair is surrounded by sea-monsters, and the dragon hoard has well, a dragon in it. Ambush can always be expected in such places.
Yet, by giving the poem this anxious feeling, perhaps the author is making a comment on the way of this culture. After-all war will destroy the Geats and the Danes. Perhaps the author is putting the heroes and readers in this constant state of war readiness not to celebrate their courage and readiness to fight, but to mock their over-willingness to fight, their offer-mod.
12.) Memorable Quote
“I remember that time when mead was flowing,
how we pledged loyalty to our lord in the hall,
promised our ring-giver we would be worth our price,
make good the gift of the war-gear,
those swords and helmets, as and when
his need required it. He picked us out
from the army deliberately, honoured us and judged us
fit for this action, made me these lavish gifts-
and all because he considered us the best
of his arms-bearing thanes. And now, although
he wanted this challenge to be one he’d face
by himself alone- the shepherd of our land,
a man unequalled in the quest for glory
and a name for daring- now the day has come
when this lord we serve needs sound men
to give him their support. Let us got o him,
help our leader through the hot flame
and dread of the fire. As god is my witness,
I would rather my body were robed in the same
burning blaze as my gold-giver’s body
Than go back home bearing arms.
Out of all the memorable quotes from Beowulf, Wiglaf’s speech just before entering the dragon hoard to defend his king stuck out in my mind the most. In this quote we are able to see the poem as an inspirational war-piece very clearly, the speech is so powerful that it makes you want to go out and defend your lord and honor. The speech also works to promote the structure of the poem as a tale of three nations through the different reactions of different men.
Wiglaf’s speech calls upon the men to rally to the king, he incites beautiful images of the mead-hall in which Beowulf honored them, and how they were chosen by Beowulf to defend him. Imagery is his most powerful tool, for after he tells of the great kindness Beowulf has shown them, he also describes the fate which Beowulf will suffer. “I would rather my body were robed in the same burning blaze as my gold-giver’s body”. The warrior culture is especially evident in this piece as well, a Christian poem would certainly be lamenting his king’s death, yet Wiglaf seems to embrace it as a glorious thing. He knows Beowulf has served a life filled with great deeds and will certainly go to Valhalla. Yet even this powerful speech was not enough to rouse the Geats to defend their lord.
The speech was written so beautifully and poetically to show that, with even the most moving speech the Geats will still not rise to defend their honor. While Wiglaf, a Swede, defends the king of the Geats, his other champions flee from his side and take to the hills. This is definitely a foreshadowing of what is to come, as explained by Wiglaf in his eulogy.
“once princes from beyond
get tidings of how you turned and fled
and disgrace yourselves. A warrior will sooner
die than live a life of shame”
He tells of the impending doom which awaits a nation that acts with cowardice, for in these times a reputation was everything. Because the Danes and Geats rely on others to solve their problems, they are doomed to fall to their enemies, while the Swedes who fight alone, are destined to triumph.

13.) Personal Response
Beowulf is a story, an entertaining story which can be enjoyed on multiple levels: like a Celtic knot, the story weaves its way interlacing many side stories and complex plots, like an unknown treasure hoard there is much to be interpreted. The poet, the storytellers, and presumably Seamus Heaney, have carefully interwoven the stories of multiple nations at a time of crisis, the story of three great deeds, and the rise and fall of a king all in one. The story presents an argument for what makes a good king, and what makes a good warrior and still manages to excite and inspire. This book is designed for the student and intellectual, those who wish to find hidden gems in literature which no-one may have yet found. This book is perfect for an AP student and should remain in the curriculum.
I enjoyed not only the complexity of Beowulf, but also the simplicity, the basic story of a warrior who goes out to kill monsters in order to attain fame, and the rise of a man from warrior to a king. With a warriors exceptional valor so clearly elucidated, and used as an inspiration it is easy to see how the Viking people were able to dominate the northern shores of Europe for so many hundreds of years. This action and courage helps still today to capture the attention of every boy who ever picked up a stick and fought the trees which he knew were evil monsters.
If I had one complaint about Beowulf, it would be the lack of character. Beowulf feels undeveloped as a person, although this may have been intentional in order to allow warriors to more easily project themselves into him, it Is frustrating and annoying at times. Always you must analyze Beowulf’s actions, his speech to find why he has done something, never is it forthrightly presented. Furthermore the lack of physical description of characters is also frustrating, as the characters seem distant, and I feel they could be clarified with a few simple adjectives.
Having said this, Beowulf still remains a terrific and exciting read. One which I would not hesitate to re-read as I am sure there would be many more subtle details to be picked up upon. I would not hesitate therefore to read another of poem of similar style to Beowulf, especially one of the same culture. Such passion and fury can be found in a people who are willing to die for glory, knowing that glory is the only way to escape what is essentially damnation. I believe that these aspects are rarely found in other cultures of the time and virtually do not exist in modern society. Beowulf remains one of the few poems able to tell a story with a purpose on many levels, appeal to such a wide audience, and inspire such emotion. It will, I am certain be read by students, children professors, and educators for centuries to come.

Saturday, October 17, 2009

EPIC ESSAY AS OF SATURDA AT 3 OCKLOCK!

Zachary Weber
Period 3
EPIC ESSAYBEOWULF10/15/09
1.)The author and HIS times
The exact date of Beowulf is unknown, the legends of Beowulf are debated as fact or fiction, the poem itself is subject to debate (should it be studied for literary merit or historical fact?), its classification as poem is challenged, even the author of Beowulf is unknown; yet, for all this Beowulf is considered an important piece and is studied internationally by literary scholars and English students alike. This is because of the unique and profound times in which the story was recorded and the interesting blend of the Christian and pagan faiths.
Beowulf is perhaps a Danish or Swedish legend, and perhaps an accounting of a great warrior: a tale from Northern Europe of great deeds and men. Whether the poem is fact or fiction is irrelevant, as somehow this story came to enter the oral tradition of the warmongering Viking people.
The Vikings conducted raids on England from the time of 793AD when Norsemen destroyed the abbey on Lindisfarne and continued until almost 1100 AD. However at about 850, a shift occurred in the Vikings. They began to settle among the English people marrying into local families, giving up there warlike ways to settle as farmers, and most importantly adopting the local religion: Christianity.
Until the Vikings settled in England, they believed in a pagan religion which focused on the glory of ones earthly deed. Only brave warriors could ascend to Valhalla where they would dine among the gods until the day of Ragnarok when they would fight the giants alongside their gods… and lose. This pagan culture is noted in the text of Beowulf obviously in the culture of the warriors that are shown. Beowulf fights Grendel, his mother, and the dragon for honor so he will be granted access to Valhalla. Those who flee from battle are banished even though they were only trying to save their own lives. Even more importantly is the reference to the giants. They are referred to as the ancient race that built the dragon’s lair, and the makers of the sword with which Beowulf slew the hag.
The poem also contains a number of Christian components as well; Beowulf often cries out to “his lord” or states that he was destined to win the battle because of God. I believe that these are in fact inserts that have been placed in the story to accommodate the English peoples Christian culture. Thus the story would have been written down by some English monk or high-person. In this time the ability to read and write was a very rare skill, few outside of the clergy were capable of writing at all let alone transcribing a poem hundreds of lines long. Thus Beowulf must not be treated lightly for it was most likely someone’s life work to record. A member of the clergy who supplemented the story so that it could be better understood among the English people and would spread the Christian faith.
As mentioned earlier the Vikings had begun to settle into England, perhaps the Christian translation of this poem is not an attempt at enabling the English to access it, but rather a way of converting the Vikings into Christians. Monk would have a keen desire to do this because previously the pagan Vikings had been a raider of churches, often selling monks into slavery.
Thus Beowulf in my opinion is an ancient story of the Vikings, a fairy tale perhaps or an accounting of a great warrior which during the conquests of Anglo-Saxon England was transcribed by a Christian influence. Although attempting to use this great poem as a tool for Christianity, the pagan influences are still apparent in subtle details.
2. Form/structure/plot
Like everything else in Beowulf the structure of the piece is under debate. The easy way of analyzing the poem is that it is an escalation of the three battles climaxing in Beowulf’s death. However, in Beowulf there are a number of side-stories which seem to be inconsequential to the main story, they do not further the plot and in my opinion would have been dropped out of oral tradition over the years if they were unimportant. Thus, I believe that these transgressions presented within the poem are actually a telling of important times and a shifting of powers between three cultures: the Danes, the Geats, and the Swedes. This is the true meaning and story of Beowulf.
If you believe, as I do, that Beowulf is truly the story of 3 nations then the structure of the poem is very complex. After all not many poems focus on the unimportant and leave the important to the outskirts. This complex method is used to hide certain aspects of the poem from certain people. The story as an oral poem, was passed down by tradition, the simple action could be appreciated by the young; those preparing to go to war. The more subtle story of the nations would not be picked up by these young men. However, the elderly and battle weary would pick up on this delicate theme. In this way the poem made a sad comment on the aspects of war to those who had experienced it, while at the same time inspiring the young to go to battle, fight to the death, and die for heroic glory.
In order to make this undertone subtly apparent, the poet used a number of foreshadowing and sequencing techniques. Foreshadowing is especially important because the reader is never actually told whether or not the nations will fall or succeed, the destinies of the nations are only hinted at. The poet hints that the Danes will fall in a story told in the hall of Herot, that the Geats will fall at the funeral of Beowulf, and that the Swedes will rise in the stories told of the wars against the Swedes. Again this subtle hinting helps to hide the true nature of war from the young and naïve.
The way the story is sequenced is also important, after every battle there is a feast, celebration, or gathering of some kind, at which stories and speeches are made. These stories for the most part constitute the transgressions. After Beowulf slays Grendel it is hinted “The Shielding nation was not yet familiar with feud and betrayal” pg 67. and the tale of betrayal between the Frisians and Danish is told. After Beowulf kills Grendel’s mother, Hrothgar foreshadows the falling of the Geats by describing the dangers of power also in a number of stories told when Beowulf returns home the tale of the rising Swedes is told. Lastly after Beowulf’s fight with the dragon the fall of the Geat people is imminent and foretold by the new SWEDISH king of the Geat people: Wiglaf.
In a short summary, Beowulf a Geat travels to Denmark to confront Grendel who has been terrorizing herot. He ambushes Grendel and easily defeats him in hand to hand combat. At the feast afterwards, the fall of the Danes is predicted. Next Beowulf fights Grendel’s mother in her own lair after she avenges her son’s death on Herot. This time his sword fails and he must use an ancient weapon which he finds in the hag’s lair. He is protected by his mail and returns unscathed. When Beowulf returns home and in a number of intercalary chapters, the rise of the Swedes is foreseen. Lastly Beowulf fights the dragon after it is awoken by a slave, he must again venture into his enemies lair, and again his weapon fails him. His men all abandon him with the exception of Wiglaf, who helps him to slay the dragon. Beowulf is mortally wounded and makes Wiglaf king of Geatland. Ironically Wiglaf is a Swede. Wiglaf then tells of how Geatland will be overrun by Swedes because the Geats have no courage or champions.
3.) Point of View/ Perspective
The poem Beowulf has an odd point of perspective and point of view. The majority of the poem is written in third person omniscient. The reader hovers over Beowulf’s shoulder, yet at times will jump to happening which Beowulf could not possibly have knowledge (unless of course he’s Jesus)

4.) Character
Beowulf has no character, at least not one that the reader is ever made aware of. The poet never delves into the reasons behind Beowulf’s actions. In fact Beowulf is never even described physically. Instead the reader comes into contact with the character that is Beowulf through his actions and words alone. Even though we follow Beowulf from his rising to the time of his death, a time period of over 50 years, he still remains highly undeveloped. He remains the powerful warrior: deadly yet mysterious.
The story follows him from his rise to glory all the way to his demise, though it skips the 50 years in which he became king, defeated nations single handedly, and defended the nation with his reputation… apparently because they were unexciting. However this 50 year gap is filled in tales of what has occurred, the reader is simply not allowed to be there when it takes place. After spending all this time with Beowulf he remains an enigma. We assume that he fights Grendel to gain honor and glory, but there is also mention of his father’s debt to Hrothgar. We assume that he kills the hag to avenge Hrothgar, yet couldn’t it be some Christian crusade of ridding the world of Cain’s influence? In truth nothing is known about why Beowulf performs his actions, and thus nothing is known about his true personality.
Now take a look at what is known about Beowulf. His name is a keening for bee-hunter, meaning the bear, which is important in the ancient northern European culture as a symbol of power and courage. Beowulf appears to be an archetype warrior: fearless, powerful, and eager for glory. However, he fails as a king to provide security for his country after his death. This is one main purpose of Beowulf, to show what makes a good king and a bad king, but also to show the different qualities of a warrior and king. Again as an oral tale Beowulf works on two levels, warning the elderly of a flaw in kings, while at the same time telling children of a magnificent warrior.
Beowulf is rarely described by the narrator, instead he is commented on by characters, his actions and his words. However what is perhaps the most direct comment on his personality is made by the narrator in the closing lines of the poem. “They said that of al the kings upon he earth he was the man most gracious and fair-minded, kindest to his people and keenest to win fame.” pg 213 This shows the difference between king and warrior, for a king is not supposed to be so kind to his people that they never have to fight o become hardened warriors. He was always ready to earn the fame which should have been his champions. This was his tragic flaw his interaction with others.
The people who surround Beowulf are treated with a similar lack of detail. In fact there are virtually no physical descriptions of people in the poem. This may tie into the culture of the times, and how people were judged on their heroic deeds rather than their nationality or looks. However there are a few exceptions to the lack of physical descriptions, most importantly in what the people wear. Their armor, swords, and weapons are described often brilliantly. This is because these facts DO relate to culture, and the deeds which warriors have done. Swords especially are a symbol of power and rank as you must have either wealth enough to have one made or killed someone who had such power. Armor too was expensive, and showed rank as well as shields, especially those made of metal.
For example take the character Unferth. He is revealed as a coward, because he did not defend the hall against Grendel, a drunkard in his speech against Beowulf. Beowulf calls him a kin-killer. He is also later revealed to have a magnificent sword named Hrunting, logically he must be a fairly powerful warrior to possess such a sword. He is not ever described but his deeds are hinted at, and his character can be analyzed in his speech, many important things about each character can be discovered by analyzing close details. In this way the characters of Beowulf are unveiled.
5.) Setting
Ancient Denmark, Sweden, and Norway: this is where Beowulf takes place. In the depths of a hell-like hall to the golden feasting place, Herot and the magnificent treasure hoard of the dragon. The story spans three nations, each of which has its own distinct feel and atmosphere. Each of these places are intricately woven into each other, paralleling or supplementing each other in a tie more intricate than the most complicated Celtic knot.
The first important is Heorot. “The hall of halls. Heorot was the name he had settled on it, whose utterance was law.” Pg 7 Heorot is a place of heaven on earth, where literally no evil is meant to be done. The king promised even not give out “common land” or “people’s lives”, both of which were common practices in these days. Yet the attempted perfect-ness of the hall is spoiled by the inability of the Danish to defend it, their weakness is seen as a failure to their king. Even though many stand to fight Grendel, none survive. Thus an air of the hall when Beowulf arrives is that of failure, distress, and anxiety. The people are on edge and wary of outsiders. After Beowulf defeats Grendel, the hall returns to some normalcy, it becomes again a place of feasting and honor. Heorot is important because it shows how a good king should conduct his hall, the warriors are there to defend the king, the king is there to reward and praise the warriors. Yet by failing to defend itself even with an army of men inside, Heorot can be seen as a failure of the warrior culture and perhaps a negative comment on war.
The second location is Grendel’s mother’s lair. Because her family can not enjoy the pleasures of men, they seek solitude in an underground palace. The hall is described in the following lines “he saw firelight, a gleam and flare-up, a glimmer of brightness” pg105 The brilliant hall parallels Heorot, a shining star in the field of darkness. The parallels continue, Grendels mother comes to avenge her son’s death just as Beowulf avenges the death of Aschere, perhaps neither of them were necessarily evil, only acting out of honor. The hag’s hall is important to the story because it promotes the theme of courage and honor. No other man has ever been able to dive to the hall. Beowulf is forced to resort to a weapon in this hall, although his fails him (a theme of the poem). The various places and ways in which Beowulf is able to triumph is a way of showing how great of a warrior he is.
The final location is the hoard of the dragon. In Beowulf’s homeland, this dragon fight is the antithesis of Beowulf’s fight with Grendel. Again the hall is magnificent, and underground just as the hag’s lair was. Beowulf has to go into the dragon’s lair, carrying a weapon, which fails him, he even brings back-up… which also fails him. Each of these settings are important as they show the escalating battles which Beowulf undertakes.
6.) Theme
7.) Critical Review
The Defense of Heorot: Resisting the Attack on Human Solidarity
Heorot Hall has fallen into despair. A loathsome beast has ravaged the Danish town center. A confident hero comes and proclaims himself defender of the hall. Comparing components of this story with those countless archived children’s tales stored away in our memories, we must ask
ourselves if there is something more universal and more essential to the human condition here than meets the eye. What is this hall that it draws the valiant warrior Beowulf across ancient feud lines to offer his mighty sword and impose his will upon any and all offenders? What does the hideous beast seek to destroy that is so genuinely valued by the Danes and the Geats alike?Beowulf stands up as protector of something much deeper than the mere surface expectations of the reader for bravery and honor; he passionately fights to protect the deep solidarity that Heorot represents for humanity. Viewing Grendel’s assault on this human solidarity, we must conclude that the value of the hall regarding international relations and the power of the human spirit is that for which Beowulf must so ardently fight. Heorot Hall represents the togetherness and fellowship of all peoples; a true monument to the oneness of the human spirit. “Far and wide through the world, I have heard, / orders for work to adorn that wall stead / were sent to many peoples. And soon it stood there, / finished and ready, in full view, / the hall of halls…” (7). Hrothgar, the newly appointed ruler of the Danes, sent orders to the known world for the construction of a great hall. With great gusto, laborers from around the world came to “adorn the wallstead” and to place their mark as a remembrance of the fellowship that would be contained within the very walls of Heorot.
It is no great stretch of the imagination to therefore conclude that Beowulf, upon hearing of the threat against Heorot, took it upon himself to stage a defense against him who would destroy the very building that for the people represented the deep solidarity of the human spirit. The
beast who would perpetrate such a vile act therefore cannot merely bare the image of some mindless ogre springing from our endless archive of childhood stories, but rather one who would seek to destroy the very foundation of the essence of togetherness. “So Grendel ruled in defiance of right, / one against all, until the greatest house / in the world stood empty, a deserted wall stead/” (11). In these very words we see three aspects of the true nature of the beast which draw our attention to the fundamental character of his loathsome being. First, he rules “in defiance of right“, as though the values by which the whole of humanity is governed were in fact the bane of his existence. Secondly, he stands one against all, clearly demonstrating his isolation and profound hatred for togetherness. “It harrowed him / to hear the din of the loud banquet / every day in the hall…” (9). The sound of men conversing and laughing together in community strikes deep into the chasm of the soul of the beast and urges him to rise up for the slaughter. Thirdly, the hall stood empty and the wallstead which bore the countless marks of laborers from all over the world stood in shambles. We now see Grendel’s purpose in assaulting the famed hall: to bring emptiness where there was once fullness and to divide what was once united. The emptiness of the hall is a sad contrast to the rejoicing and fellowship that took place the night before, and the high walls that once proudly bore the names of all of the nations no longer stand. For this very reason the Geats did not hesitate in sending their most valiant warrior to stand up in the face of the threat against the human spirit. “Then news of Grendel, / hard to ignore, reached me at home: / sailors brought stories of the plight you suffer / in this legendary hall, how it lies deserted, / empty and useless once the evening light / hides itself under heaven’s dome. / So every elder and experienced councilman / among my people supported my resolve / to come here to you…” (29).Beowulf, defender of the people, takes up the charge against him who would break the wallstead of togetherness and destroy the international symbol of human unity.
Heorot is ravaged, the wallstead is deserted and there are no longer men filling the rafters with laughter and the strains of the harp. This wonderful monument to the united spirit of all men stands deserted and empty, while Grendel delights in his success in bringing destruction upon the
world’s fellowship center. The only glimmer of hope comes from the north, from the Geats, who have sent their most heroic warrior to wage war against the one who would commit such a crime against the human spirit. Standing against the face of evil, Beowulf protects the united community of man and does not allow the division and emptiness that are born from the soul of the vile beast Grendel to ravage the halls of Heorot any longer. Resisting Grendel’s savage attack on human solidarity, Beowulf takes up the defense of Heorot and the case of every nation whose name was so poignantly placed upon the high walls of this great hall of men.
Young, David. "The Defense of Heorot: Resisting the Attack on Human Solidarity." A Critical Analysis of Beowulf (2006). Web. 17 Oct. 2009 .
David Young skillfully argues that Beowulf comes to Heorot to protect it because it is a symbol of international piece. He calls upon specific details including the multi-national work force used to construct heorot, and makes many incites into why Grendel is attacking there. However I feel he has failed to understand the times in which Beowulf occurs. A building designed to represent international peace is all well and good in an age where today we can sit down at the UN, and talk diplomatically, where most of our religions call for a peaceful life and ascent to heaven, where our culture no longer calls for heroic deeds and epic adventures, but what David Young fails to account for is that this was not the mentality a warrior 1500 years ago would have had.
Beowulf fought for Hrothgar for honor whether for him or to avenge his father’s debt is debatable. Beowulf himself states over and over again how he will win glory by defeating Grendel. Furthermore if he was there to protect the hall as a symbol of peace, he would not have needed to chase down and kill Grendel’s mother, who was only avenging her son’s death. Look at how the dead are treated, Beowulf takes of the heads of his victims and parades them back to Heorot, is this a man who wanted or cared about international peace? No. Instead Beowulf kills these two creatures to enhance his fame and reputation, which he is most proud of. If you may have any doubt of this read Beowulf’s boasting about how he swam for 7 days in full armor, and your doubts shall be quelled.
Although this interpretation presents a new look at Beowulf’s motives it fails to account the warrior tradition which is apparent in these times. David Young has clearly not studied the Viking religion, the constant doom and ultimate failure they believed in, as well as the fall of Valhalla. A culture which believes that their entire world both material and supernatural is doomed and the only way to “survive” is to be sang of would not care if a hall was erected to glorify international peace. In fact they’d probably ransack it.
8.) Diction
10.) Tone
12.) Memorable Quote
13.) Personal Response
Beowulf is a story, an entertaining story which can be enjoyed on multiple levels: like a Celtic knot, the story weaves its way interlacing many side stories and complex plots, like an unknown treasure hoard there is much to be interpreted. The poet, the storytellers, and presumably Seamus Heaney, have carefully interwoven the stories of multiple nations at a time of crisis, the story of three great deeds, and the rise and fall of a king all in one. The story presents an argument for what makes a good king, and what makes a good warrior and still manages to excite and inspire. This book is designed for the student and intellectual, those who wish to find hidden gems in literature which no-one may have yet found. This book is perfect for an AP student and should remain in the curriculum.
I enjoyed not only the complexity of Beowulf, but also the simplicity, the basic story of a warrior who goes out to kill monsters in order to attain fame, and the rise of a man from warrior to a king. With a warriors exceptional valor so clearly elucidated, and used as an inspiration it is easy to see how the Viking people were able to dominate the northern shores of Europe for so many hundreds of years. This action and courage helps still today to capture the attention of every boy who ever picked up a stick and fought the trees which he knew were evil monsters.
If I had one complaint about Beowulf, it would be the lack of character. Beowulf feels undeveloped as a person, although this may have been intentional in order to allow warriors to more easily project themselves into him, it Is frustrating and annoying at times. Always you must analyze Beowulf’s actions, his speech to find why he has done something, never is it forthrightly presented. Furthermore the lack of physical description of characters is also frustrating, as the characters seem distant, and I feel they could be clarified with a few simple adjectives.
Having said this, Beowulf still remains a terrific and exciting read. One which I would not hesitate to re-read as I am sure there would be many more subtle details to be picked up upon. I would not hesitate therefore to read another of poem of similar style to Beowulf, especially one of the same culture. Such passion and fury can be found in a people who are willing to die for glory, knowing that glory is the only way to escape what is essentially damnation. I believe that these aspects are rarely found in other cultures of the time and virtually do not exist in modern society. Beowulf remains one of the few poems able to tell a story with a purpose on many levels, appeal to such a wide audience, and inspire such emotion. It will, I am certain be read by students, children professors, and educators for centuries to come.